The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The table illustrates how many miles were traveled by British people in the 1985-2000 phase, divided into 9 categories.
The first prominent feature is that the average distance in the UK experienced an overall upward trend over the years. In addition, among all vehicle means, Car registered the most impressive figures while the least sizeable numbers belonged to Bicycle and Taxi.
In particular, people in England traveled 429 miles by Local bus in the former year and this figure decreased almost half to 274 miles in the latter year. This tendency was also shared by Trains and Other modes. Specifically, there was a 77-mile and 135-mile growth in traveling distance by these two transport types respectively.
On the lower end of the table, Taxi saw a tripling result over the course of 15 years starting in 1985 whereas there was an incredibly slight decline in the amount of distance by Bicycle which was only 10 miles. Another noticeable characteristic is that Long-distance Bus witnessed quite a significant growth which started from 54 miles to 124 miles in the year 2000.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-09-11 | NhNhSF | 78 | view |
2019-12-12 | hungnguyen2712 | 73 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 95
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
- Being a celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 937.175257732 98% => OK
No of words: 180.0 206.0 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07777777778 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73453000002 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 127.690721649 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.672222222222 0.622605031667 108% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 290.88556701 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3392972848 44.8134815571 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 76.5299724578 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 16.8248392259 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 4.34317383033 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0967622319194 0.216113520407 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426312894704 0.0766984524023 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552234143357 0.0603063233224 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693594693539 0.12726935374 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659011126562 0.0580467560999 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 8.37731958763 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 8.71597938144 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 7.59969072165 127% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 41.2886597938 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.