The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features

Essay topics:

The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features.

The flow chart shows what typically occurs as a consequence of deforestation. When trees are removed, there are four main immediate effects, which eventually result in flooding, degraded vegetation, and a loss of biodiversity.

One immediate effect is soil which has been compacted by heavy equipment. The result hard, ‘baked’ soil contributes to the runoff of rainwater and, eventually, flooding.

Another immediate consequence of logging is a reduction in the number of roots holding the soil together. This leads to soil erosion. As a consequence, the quality and variety of vegetation are compromised.

The third immediate effect is burning, both deliberate and a consequence of an increased risk of forest fires. The waste that remains after loggings is destroyed and the microorganisms that feed on this material are lost. This leads to degraded vegetation.

The final immediate consequence is a reduction in the number of moisture plants return to the air. Because there is less moisture in the air, there is less precipitation and an increased incidence of drought. This too reduces plant growth and ultimately results in degraded vegetation and a loss of biodiversity.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-22 hahoaan 73 view
2024-11-21 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 78 view
2024-11-19 hahoaan 78 view
2024-11-16 Trần Ánh Vy 67 view
Essays by user vuhieuquy :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45405405405 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18187893276 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5607800955 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6153846154 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2307692308 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07692307692 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0814741678897 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295430023433 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519329670359 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0473552535163 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512334677996 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.