Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion about this?
Recently, the phenomenon of "nowadays, TV has become an essential part of life" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that mass media might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the presence of TV can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, TV as an essential part of life can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that spreading news and increasing the awareness of people are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of TV in human's life. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both advertisements and raising funds distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the lack of TV to spread news might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the lack of valid information. Moreover, fundamental aspects of being a companion can relate to the reality that the demerits of living alone can pertain to being a member of a family. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of TV programs were correlated positively with traditional medium, the local authorities would ultimately address the psychological problems of TV shows. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of a good balance between watching TV and physical activities.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of TV as an essential part of life far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-12 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people say that people are defined by the place where they grow up but some argue that the environment only has little effect To what extent do you agree or disagree Use a celebrity you know to support your opinion 96
- If Voting is compulsory in democratic society what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy 88
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41924398625 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2882270701 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615120274914 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4443505535 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.363636364 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246344600144 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799077405683 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618365143184 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14063335227 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021408705603 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.