The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph depicts the data for waste production in tonnes by three different companies from the year 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it is conspicuous that at the start of the period maximum waste was produced by the company A. However, at the end of the period company C was the highest producer of waste.
It is clear from the graph that company A registered the decreasing trend over the period. In the year 2000, it produced 12 tonnes of waste, which then decreased significantly to almost 8 tonnes in the year 2015. Similarly, company B also faced reduction in waste production but it increased from 2000 to 2005. Production of waste by company B increased from around 8 tonnes in 2000 to almost 10 tonnes in 2005. Then it decreased drastically to 3 tonnes in the year 2015.
On the other hand, company C registered the upward trend throughout the period. In the year 2000, there was 4 tonnes of waste produced by company C which then achieved the highest and increased to 10 tonnes in the year 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Phuong1810 | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Phuong1810 | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | dorae | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 Th table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main f 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62430939227 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57982063274 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425414364641 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.92571838 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209623663693 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109254995286 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431788985953 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155753886027 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104780068919 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.