The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, there are more and more social media platforms appearing at an unprecedented pace. Some argue that this phenomenon would threaten physical interactions among individuals, while others believe that its merits have exceeded its demerits. From my perspective, I strongly agree with the latter statement that there are more pros in using the media.
On the one hand, properly utilizing electrical communications could generate enormous benefits. One of them would be the fast and on-demand connection. For example, by possessing a Facebook account, employees and managers could hold meetings instantly without distance restrictions. Furthermore, various opportunities updated directly into these social media could have a tremendous effect. Thanks to the development of these technologies, everyone around the world now would be able to approach chances in various fields such as education, careers, travels and, especially, information. In other words, these virtual environments affect not only individuals but also the whole globe.
On the other hand, whereas there are many undeniable positive impacts, some drawbacks should be considered simultaneously. By its incredible conveniences, media are increasingly replacing physical interactions among humans. Neighbour conversation, for instance, would likely be ignored as people can chat with their online friends through a virtual platform. Therefore, the bond between nearby individuals would lessen dramatically. Moreover, people who over manipulate these social media would eventually encounter many significant social issues. Meaning that the more one replaces their real-world interactions by online communications, the more possible that they will catch a problem toward a physical relationship in the long-term.
To conclude, even though virtual platforms could have some negative consequences, the gains they bring to human's development path are outweighed the cons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that what children watch on television influences their behaviour Others say that amount of time spent watching television influences their behaviour Discuss both views and give own opinion 89
- Businesses should have social responsibilities in the communities where they operate To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that it is better to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 83
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y individuals but also the whole globe. On the other hand, whereas there are man...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...physical relationship in the long-term. To conclude, even though virtual platfor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06909090909 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14082896885 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665454545455 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.120580545 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148117114476 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464493885435 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536429856478 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816569418986 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591828498009 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.63 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.