Nowadays environmental problems are too big for individual countries or people to solve. We have reached the stage where we need cooperation on an international level to protect the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The industrialisation has been cited as among the main culprits deteriorating environmental problems in a large-scale. While some contend that citizens and the individual government without any international assistance could minimize the grave consequences of pollution-related problems, I am opposed to this view.
On the one hand, international cooperation on environmental issues is beneficial to the sustainable development of humans and the country. Addressing ice-melting that is exacerbating rising sea levels will indeed protect humans from losing their homes. Take Indonesia as a prime example, the Indonesian authorities along with international organisations are constructing floodwalls alongside the sea to safeguard millions of citizens with inherited disadvantages in Jakarta’s coastal cities from having their homes inundated, which might promote city dwellers in those sea-facing metropolises to improve their financial hardship towards a further prosperous life. Additionally, mounting international campaigns on alleviating the consequences of severe drought might ensure national food security. ASEAN countries, for instance, are calling for China’s collaboration in watering the Mekong River to save cultivation activities of farmlands nearby the described river. This is likely to guarantee domestic rice productivity of Thailand and Vietnam, which will then partly meeting worldwide demands by exporting.
On the other hand, some believe that domestic actions by the government and citizens are an indispensable factor in confronting environmental problems. In practice, the individual government could ease the severe effects of pollution-related problems without outside intervention. Netherland’s white bike scheme is a typical example for other affluent and developing countries to harness since bikes fail to emit carbon dioxide emissions into the environment. What is more, it is consumers who could avoid using plastic shopping bags to protect the pristine environment. This is likely to reduce the number of toxic pollutants from the burning of plastic bags.
In conclusion, although domestic efforts to tackle environmental issues, including encouraging people to commute by bikes and abandoning plastic bags might be effective to some extents, it is my firm conviction that this should be done by global cooperation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-28 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | Rustam Asrorov | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | Rustam Asrorov | 95 | view |
- Some people think that the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others believe that the main interest is in the world of business Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences What extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The most effective way to solve the current traffic and pollution problems in cities is to encourage people to move from the suburbs or the countryside into the city centre To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- In many parts of the world some famous people are considered as role models and they are having an increasing influence on the young Is this a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...deteriorating environmental problems in a large-scale. While some contend that citizens and t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10510510511 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44221961864 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636636636637 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.4283144908 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.214285714 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135389200065 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437942866461 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252718713891 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726226826002 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266531437162 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.45 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.