In the modern world people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

In the modern world, people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Vegetarianism is becoming a notable tendency nowadays, and hence a large of people assume that humankind does not need to use animals for different purposes such as making cuisines, drugs, and clothing. From my perspective, I partly agree with that opinion.
On the one hand, I consider that people should remain to use animals for food manufacture. Some types of animal meat supply nutrients which can not find in a variety of vegetables, and therefore those help people have more development in both physical and spirit. As a result, they can create more value for their country. For example, the athletics who win the gold medal in the Olympic always have a daily balanced diet including meats as well as vegetables. Furthermore, if people continue to spend their money on meat from animals, it will support the development of agriculture. Corporations that operate in this field can recruit more employees and contribute more tax on the national budget.
On the other hand, I also suppose that humankind does not need to use animals for other products. First, with the development of technology and medical progress, people can research other methods to make up medicine instead of using animals. Likewise, it is unnecessary to use the parts of animal for fashion purpose. Second, if people can stop using creatures in those fields, this action can contribute to the protection of our surroundings bio-diversity simply because the number of animals hunted will decrease remarkably.
In a nutshell, I believe that animal plays a vital role in the daily meals of people. However, the usage of animals in other fields should be prohibited by the administration.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-11-13 perry1812 67 view
2020-10-01 hailubmt 61 view
2020-04-01 hinguyn 78 view
Essays by user hailubmt :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, likewise, second, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85435667664 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6500851232 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6428571429 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216309810705 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07804547876 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495330868926 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134850780515 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320993554465 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.