Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is argued that people might not do a big change to the environment; and governments and big companies can do it. From my perspective, I completely disagree that only leaders of countries and large businesses can change positively the environment because individuals is the most important part to improve the circumstance of polluting environment.
On the one hand, it is clear that huge governments’ actions, such as policies and funds, can make a step improve in environmental circumstances. For example, if governments are tough to create a business or run a company, some environmental harmfully companies cannot be opened. Therefore, the air quality and the atmosphere quality will be healthy for people. Moreover, some large companies can provide funds to open green places, such as a green park, to create a green atmosphere in a locality. Besides, governments and major companies can collaborate to quash polluting actions. As a result, substantial governmental actions can create a well-quality environment for people.
On the other hand, people are responsible and essential to enhance the quality of the environment. For example, citizens can take place some tree planting party to plant extensive trees. If every people plant a tree a year, a huge number of trees will be planted every year. Thus, the atmosphere quality will be developed, and people’s health will be positively affected. Moreover, individuals should be responsible for observing and enforcing governmental policies. In conclusion, people are extensively responsible and influentially necessary to develop the quality of the environment.
To sum up, not only governments have national social responsibility but also branding companies have corporate social responsibility to improve positively the situtation of the globe. Moreover, each person has social responsibility and personal responsibility to acting initiative to enhance the environment where they are living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 56
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced Summarise the important information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea and make comparisons where appropriate 67
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62162162162 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36985411072 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1466063323 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242959341642 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793336484607 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802074539967 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159815850234 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119257664008 0.056905535591 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.