many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered animal species, for example the tiger or the blue whale. To what extent do you agree and disagree with this statement
Some people believe that spending money on preserving endangered animal species is unworthy. Personally, I partly agree with this opinion.
On the one hand, there are main benefits when there animal species are saved. Firstly, they play a vital role in food chains because they are not only predators but also preys of other animals in nature. Thus, if endangered animal species extinct, the circulation of food chains will be interrupted, which is detrimental for searching for food of different kinds of animal. Secondly, conserving endangered animal species means that we save the diversity of natural environment. Thanks to this, scientists who study in biological and natural fields will have opportunities to research the nature fully. As a result, we can protect natural environment, which has a huge influence on lives of people.
On the other hand, in the world, there are still a considerable number of poor people who need to receive assistances from governments. One example is that in big city, beggars and homeless people who are unemployed still hardly make ends meet daily. Thus, their government should allocate much money to solve unemployment and accommodation problems for them. Another example is that local residents in developing countries suffer from starvation and poverty. Besides, these people also have not access to education and medical services. Thereby, spending funding on preserving endangered animal species is considered as a waste of money in this situation.
In conclusion, I think that it is beneficial for human to continue natural conservation campaigns, but depending on the economic condition and development of countries, each authorities should invest money to these activities based on their financial abilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-17 | nguyen van a | 79 | view |
- many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered animal species for example the tiger or the blue whale To what extent do you agree and disagree with this statement 79
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this a positive or negative development 35
- Today many people spend less and less time in their home What are the reasons for this What are effects of this trend on this individuals and society 67
- Some people think it is important for all children to learn history in school Other believe that other subjects are more relevant to children s lives today Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47619047619 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9233156053 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5779594163 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245100288945 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814566600879 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661433383688 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151087297054 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777648632207 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.