Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Other, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Discuss both these views and give you own opinion.
It is true that some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Other way, school as a place to learn about this. In this case, I totally agree because it is more important than involvement from parents to their children.
However, the school are a good place to educate children how to be a good member of society. It is because children at school will meet with different character person. They will play with their friend and educate by their teacher. At the result, children should adapt to get a good interact with others. So that they are not only communicate with their parents in daily activities, but also another person with different character.
In other hand, some reasons relevant about learning how to be a good society are better in home than at school. Firstly, several children are difficult to communicate to other people. It is because they always need guide by their family. For example, some disabilities children have certain way to communicate. They should be accompanied by their parents. Secondly, Parents are a good educator for their children. It is because the children always interact with their parents especially at home. For example, having lunch together while watching TV at home would make some reciprocal action between parents and children. At the result, the children will learn something new directly from their parent. Family should be a good educator for children beside learn from school.
For where I stand, I believe that children will know how to be a good community by communicate to other people other than stay at home. School is one of place to meet different character person so that children can learn more about being country society.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-10-21 | Andi Rifani | 56 | view |
2020-10-18 | brandnewiman | 73 | view |
2020-10-10 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
2020-10-10 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
2020-10-09 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
- The chart belows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The pie chart show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The chart belows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nother person with different character. In other hand, some reasons relevant abo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97250859107 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49558838916 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450171821306 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0103683796 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.35 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.55 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347250522646 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133290517772 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106450191884 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26828973308 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986000550875 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.58950901804 78% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.