Some people think the news has no real connection to people’s lives, so reading newspapers or watching news programmes on television is a waste of time.
Do you agree or disagree?
News plays a pivotal role in human's life in providing each and every information nationally or internationally. Some individuals opine that it provides us fake and misleading news that has no connection with the reality of someone's lives. As a result, they avoid watching them and believe it is a waste of time. But in my view, despite facing criticism for providing misappropriate messages, they enlighten us about the information of every corner of the world.
To start with, it is true that news channels provide information that has no real connection with humans lives. For instance, they provide unnecessary knowledge about the lifestyle of those who belong to the film industry that has no relevant connection with the life of a common man. Moreover, to increase the number of viewers they tend to exaggerate false and inappropriate news without having any evidence. For example, it was announced by India that the vaccine for coronavirus will be available to everyone in August. But in reality, there is no vaccine available in the market to cure the diseased person. As a result, people start losing their trust in news programs and avoid watching them.
However, it is not good to criticize news channels every time. If there was no news channel then we would not be able to get knowledge about the well-being of other countries. For example, in 2018, every news channel in India covered the life of individuals that got affected beacsue of flood in Kerala state and asked for the donation from the people settled in India or abroad. As a result, many other nations donated a huge amount of money for providing the essentials to the flood victims. Thus, news channels are the primary source for individuals from where they can get the information by sitting at home.
To sum up, despite having a bad image of the news channels we are still dependent on them to provide messages about the things happening in one nation or another. But, it becomes the responsibility of them not to mislead people and provide knowledge that is relevant to humans life.
News plays a pivotal role in human's life in providing each and every information nationally or internationally. Some individuals opine that it provides us fake and misleading news that has no connection with the reality of someone's lives. As a result, they avoid watching them and believe it is a waste of time. But in my view, despite facing criticism for providing misappropriate messages, they enlighten us about the information of every corner of the world.
To start with, it is true that news channels provide information that has no real connection with humans lives. For instance, they provide unnecessary knowledge about the lifestyle of those who belong to the film industry that has no relevant connection with the life of a common man. Moreover, to increase the number of viewers they tend to exaggerate false and inappropriate news without having any evidence. For example, it was announced by India that the vaccine for coronavirus will be available to everyone in August. But in reality, there is no vaccine available in the market to cure the diseased person. As a result, people start losing their trust in news programs and avoid watching them.
However, it is not good to criticize news channels every time. If there was no news channel then we would not be able to get knowledge about the well-being of other countries. For example, in 2018, every news channel in India covered the life of individuals that got affected beacsue of flood in Kerala state and asked for the donation from the people settled in India or abroad. As a result, many other nations donated a huge amount of money for providing the essentials to the flood victims. Thus, news channels are the primary source for individuals from where they can get the information by sitting at home.
To sum up, despite having a bad image of the news channels we are still dependent on them to provide messages about the things happening in one nation or another. But, it becomes the responsibility of them not to mislead people and provide knowledge that is relevant to humans life.
- Today people can work and live anywhere they want because of the improvement of communication technology and transport Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 67
- Some people think that it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature such as novels and poems To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981 1991 and 2001
- Some people believe that leadership skills are born while others are of opinion that leadership can be acquired Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to criticize news channels every time. If there was no news channel then we would...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, as a result, in my view, it is true, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72763419684 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495726495726 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6842405105 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.117647059 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313039792214 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112942677105 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853778609783 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203658655528 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05931266891 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to criticize news channels every time. If there was no news channel then we would...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, as a result, in my view, it is true, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72763419684 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495726495726 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6842405105 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.117647059 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313039792214 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112942677105 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853778609783 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203658655528 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05931266891 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.