In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is undoubtedly true that the distribution of money these days is not equal and, as a consequence, there is a tiny proportion of people whose salaries are spectacularly colossal. Because of that, one question arises since several people hold the belief that personal waves should not surpass a particular level. However, there are numerous others, including me, support the idea that this is advantageous to the nation. These opposite statements will be addressed in this essay
On the one hand, there are certain explanations that salary should not above a certain level. First and foremost, one could claim that excessive wage differential may result in the inequality between segments of society. By the way of exemplifying, since the amount of currency within one's nation is limited, its aggregation into a minority of people are allegedly forcing the others into poverty. In the second place, this may lead to unbalance in the labour force. There seems to be evidence that the majority of people have the tendency of choosing their future occupation due to its salary, therefore, several low-paid jobs may suffer from lack of employees and this is extremely detrimental to the national development
Nonetheless, from my perspective, the uneven monetary distribution may have beneficial impacts on the country. One fundamental benefit is that this act as a motivator. To be specific, it does not seem unreasonable to suggest that high salaries can be given as motivation for employees to strive for their work, thereby, boosting the productivity in leap and bound so that they can earn such amount of money someday. Another justification that is worth considering is the difference in the effort and grey matter people put into their work. It is particularly significant that each job requires a different level of intension and distress. Hence, extremely high salaries can be considered as a compensation for their endeavour and diligence to accomplish the duties and eliminate this may be done more damage than good
In conclusion, while setting waves at certain norms may prevent the societal gap as well as the even distribution of the labour force. However, extremely high salaries play an important role as motivation in boosting productivity as well as a reward for one's endeavour and diligence to complete their task
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-08 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | BoyClazz | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | lucynton | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | quynh123445 | 84 | view |
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 95
- In many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think the advantages outweight the disadvantages 78
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world What are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions 90
- Some people argue that formal education should start for children as early as possible, while others think that it should not start until 7 years of age. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ng, since the amount of currency within ones nation is limited, its aggregation into...
^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...our and diligence to complete their task
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, by the way, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21220159151 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94802259103 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549071618037 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.8277969692 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.357142857 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9285714286 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214766963142 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700162260953 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511833805891 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128430553796 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250808380514 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.