A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Our society flourishes when supported by the new developments and technology. As one can observe from the history, we as a society have lived our best periods in an environment that promotes free-thinking. Improvement in science can be achieved if it is not restricted by the government. I strongly agree with this suggestion and support that no restrictions should be placed on researchers and scientists in research and development field.

To begin with, development of the science research would enable the society to reach a better level. The very fundamental basis of scientific research is discovering the unknown, the curiosity of which has accelerated the growth of a man over centuries. For instance, sending human beings to moon was the biggest breakthrough of the century. Had it been, restricted by the government to undertake such risky and costly project we would have never gained an insight of these vast and intriguing unknown realms. Research and development improves our way of life and helps us understand the nature. However, restricting reaserchers and scientist would mean slowing our growth and development in scientific advancement.

In addition, research and development is the only ally for curing disease and creating vaccines for deadly unexpected diseases. It helps people with disabilities to live a normal and even productive life to the highest extent possible. For instance, restricting the funds for searching a cure of COVID-19 not only delay the process of finding a vaccine but also cause health crisis to the society. It would stress out each and every country affected by the disease and create social, economic and political effects that will leave deep and longstanding scars. The above example illustrates that the world is a highly contingent upon unpredictable factors and we should be ready for an unexpected future. Hence, placing any restrictions in RnD (Research and Development) would make our growth slower to be prepared for the next pandemic.

Of course, there are always issues of dangerous and harmful scientific discoveries and we should be wary. However, the restrictions should not be expanded since they would generate economic value for governments in the long term. Furthermore, attempt to restrict the researchers would only insult them and their work.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-04 Siddhant412 66 view
2023-09-04 SamikshaVarpe 66 view
2023-07-24 TiOluwani97 50 view
2023-07-24 TiOluwani97 50 view
2023-07-14 Technoblade 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Chaitanya02 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, of course, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2346.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41801385681 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0602631846 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554272517321 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0325722045 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.636363636 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6818181818 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177062744546 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520355380451 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972467167227 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104002250035 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129787076066 0.0667264976115 195% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.