some people believe that rich countries should provide poorer countries with help that is not financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

some people believe that rich countries should provide poorer countries with help that is not financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, the way of helping poorer countries has become one of the debatable issues among societies. Although I accepted that financial aids have some benefits, I think it is not the best way of helping.

Financial aids of rich countries have some significant effects on economic and social states pf poor countries. In fact, these helps make opportunities for developing countries to spend the aids by considering primary need of the countries. In this way the helped country could identify and prioritize the most important shortcomings of the society and allocates funds to them. Take a country suffering from sanitary problems as an example. This country is more likely to utilize the financial aids, construct health care centers, and as a consequence increase people’s longevity. Moreover, financial help is an easy helping way due to its efficiency and productivity. Indeed, in this way developed countries are not required to do a time-consuming processes, including, investigation, analysis, and evaluation of certain needs of the countries thereby a lot of time could be saved in this way.

Although financial helps have some advantages, from my perspective these are not effective ways and countries can implement more beneficial options. Some problems such as, lack of medicine and medical equipment do not have financials roots. Take African people as an suffering starvation and health problems as an example. in this country people’s health and meeting basic needs have the highest priority. Besides, science and technology development could considerably influence on poor countries flourishment because not only these measures improve and expand countries infrastructures but also have more permanent effects on economic progresses. For example, rich countries could provide poor countries with urban planning knowledge to improve the civilization.

For the reasons mentioned above, I think although financial aids could help poor countries there are more eficient ways that can be employed so as to help poor countries.

Fatemeh Norouzi

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-02-13 baretta 73 view
2020-11-21 fatemeh norouzi 89 view
2020-11-18 fatemeh norouzi 73 view
2020-09-28 Tuan Harry 89 view
Essays by user fatemeh norouzi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 750, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'process'?
Suggestion: process
...are not required to do a time-consuming processes, including, investigation, analysis, an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...inancials roots. Take African people as an suffering starvation and health problem...
^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...tion and health problems as an example. in this country people’s health and meetin...
^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...more eficient ways that can be employed so as to help poor countries. Fatemeh Nor...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, as to, for example, i think, in fact, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59365079365 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02926017925 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0358076844 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337624279569 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119554927838 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055387078915 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21998670394 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050627386314 0.056905535591 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.