In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this case? What can be done about this problem?
Why hunger as well as malnutrition are still one of the biggest social issues in the word full of cutting-edge technologies and the advanced agricultural practices? There exist two main underlying factors to this problem. First, it is cheap labor used by giants of international trade, while the second is lack of infrastructure in the areas where hunger prospers. After the deeper discussions of these causes, the practical changes could be introduced in this essay.
As for the first cause, one can assume that a great variety of multinational companies, despite the fact that they have already achieved large capitalization rates, are still bent on rising the capital by some unsustainable ways. For example, Mars Corporation, being one of the leaders in confectionary industry, was not long ago accused of using cheap labor in China. This practice, besides being unethical, also mitigates all the advanced technologies used in agriculture by simply paying relatively tiny wages to Chinese workers, resulting in hunger in certain areas, since people just do not have funds to buy food.
Secondly, advances made in agriculture in some developed countries have no connection with infrastructure and agricultural work in developing ones. The areas in Brazil or Mongolia which, however, have highly favorable for agriculture soil, are still undeveloped and lack technology, meaning the population of these areas is also deeply depend on the weather conditions. For instance, when the weather is good, people have sufficient level of harvest, but over a span of bad weather conditions, the residents have nothing to it.
Going to the possible resolution to this problem, one can name special regulations to be lifted by the states or by well-known world organizations, such as Greenpeace or OUN. The aim of such regulation should be prohibition of cheap labor and overuse of resources of developing countries. Fair trade principles could help on one dimension. But with companies whose wholehearted aim is to raise money by any means, only strict bans could force them to conform to the fair-trade policy. In addition, the programs under which developed countries with advanced auriculate should provide permanent support to the areas of malnutrition should be introduced.
After the discussion of aforementioned causes and methods, it is of great importance to say that hunger issue is assumed to be the global problem. Hi-tech in in agriculture should be widespread and cover not only the developed economies but also some poor regions. The only way to do it is to unite the resources and lend the hand to those in need without waiting to anything back.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem 89
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people say that supermarkets and manufacturers have a responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging on products they sell Others believe that it is the consumer s responsibility to avoid buying products that have a lot of packaging 70
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...N. The aim of such regulation should be prohibition of cheap labor and overuse of resources...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...sumed to be the global problem. Hi-tech in in agriculture should be widespread and co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2441314554 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01921009785 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565727699531 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1669984306 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.111111111 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214222040988 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622779179839 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554339145721 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111296984975 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336201833023 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.