The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The given map illustrates the changes of routes that took place to reach the city hospital from the year 2007 to 2010.
From analysing the maps, we can see that through the years that though the hospital remained the same, the car parking facilities has improved, as well as the infrastructure of the bus station.
During the year of 2010, both the staffs and the public had the inconvenience to park in the same location. Even the bus stops were cluttered on either side of the hospital road.
As the years passed, the access to the hospital improved. Two new roundabouts were constructed in south of the hospital. These roundabouts are linked to the bus station (situated to the west) through two separate lanes. Though the ring road remained the same, the parking facilities improved as the staff car parking was separated from the public car parking, which is situated towards the east of the hospital.
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 78
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It is inevitable that as technology develops so traditional cultures must be lost Technology and tradition are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88461538462 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55527326 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.506806472 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217693334325 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993131336325 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783666455459 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137401108183 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846132428889 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.