The pie charts below show the different types of courses, which were followed by the
students during the years of 1984, 1994 and 2004.
The pie charts give details about the different types of courses that students studied in 1984,
1994, and 2004.
Overall, it can be seen that the most common mode of studying was via face to face courses,
while online courses were the least common way to study. It is also noted that in 1984 online
courses were not available.
In 1984, 67% of all students studied via face to face courses, while 20% studied via
correspondence, and 13% mixed media courses. Online courses were not available at the time.
10 years later, studying face to face courses was slightly less popular, at 54%, while the
percentage of students studying by correspondence remained at 20%.15% of students studied
mixed media courses and 11% of students were now studying via the internet.
Studying face to face continued to become less popular by 2004, with 40% of students
choosing that mode of study, while mixed media courses were becoming far more popular, at
35%. Studying online and by correspondence had both decreased in popularity also, reaching
10% and 15% respectively.
- he chart below shows the number of visitors to the main attractions in a Europe country between 1981 and 2001 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- The chart below shows the number of visitors to the main attractions in a Europe country between 1981 and 2001 77
- The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities by youngest and oldest populations in the US in 2015 70
- The chart below shows the number of visitors to the main attractions in a Europe country between 1981 and 2001 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10169491525 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59446937658 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514124293785 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5038748799 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220800797976 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135444828642 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131785287915 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949420684413 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931603777063 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.