The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
The chart below shows how many employees and factories were in England and Wales throughout the period from 1851 to 1901.
Overall, it is seen from the table that the number of workers both male and female steadily declined during the given data, whilst the volume of plants increased. It is noticeable, that the ratio of both sex levelled off by the 1901.
Going into details, early on there were 287 100 and 190 000 of men and women respectively working at the factories. Then, in 1861 the number of male emloyees dropped to 131 780, whilst the number of female workers did not show a significant fall in comparison with men, it reduced only by 30 thousand. Further, the number of employees both genders declined evenly, before being almost aligned in 1901.
By contrast, the number of factories rose. Interestingly, that during the first ten years it increased only by two factories, with further steady rising and reaching the highest peak of 721 in 1881, followed by gradual falling by 1901.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | nguyenkhangtriem | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | songuyen14 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | tuonglinh | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Chen ni | 84 | view |
- The graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year 89
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 84
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives What kind of problems can this cause What solutions can you suggest 84
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 88
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8488372093 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4726464628 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1740719894 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325741845446 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134514240645 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135374660603 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201542250498 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149093109721 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.