Many goods transported for long distance. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There is no gainsaying the fact that many a person, living in geographically secluded locations, relies mainly on imports as they are incapable of producing the goods themselves. Therefore, a certain echelon of the society is in the business of transporting them even to the far of lands. Although exporting of raw materials as well as manufactured items to other countries might be of benefit to the mother country as it would boost its economy and increase job opportunities, there is no denying the fact that it would have a negative impact on the countries receiving them.
To initiate with the fruits of exporting that developed countries reap. First and foremost, this business is helpful in uplifting their economy and asserting their presence on the map. To be precise, should there be more trade with other countries, there would be more money pouring into their economy. In other words, the richer the country is, the wealthier and happier its citizens will be. For example, according to a survey conducted by Indian Trade Society, the G.D.P of the country grew by 12% once a trade route was established to far south African countries, for almost everything had to be provided to them. Second to this is that there would be more job prospects for the blue collars as they would not require much advanced education for heavy labor work. Therefore, it is evident for developed countries trading goods will increase their economy by folds and also help in providing jobs to their citizens; however, the same is not true for the country on the receiving end.
There are some nations which are so backwards that they do not even have the rudimentary amenities for their day to day life and solely rely on imports. This is because they are not motivated in developing something of their own. In other words, this backward mindset and the constant receival of everyday imports is deterring them from becoming a developing nation. Take Uganda for instance, they receive toothbrushes and even soaps from neighboring allies. This dependency makes them not appreciate the value of education and even enforce their children into heavy labor just for the sake of earning money.
To reiterate, even though developed nations find it easy to increase their economy though imports and exports, it had better be understood by the countries receiving them that they totally cannot be relying on them and need to find a tool for their developmental success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
- ln many parts of the world children are given more freedom than in the past ls this a positive or a negative development 93
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
- Multinational companies are becoming increasingly common in developing countries What are the advantages and disadvantages of that 67
- Many goods transported for long distances Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: P
...ducted by Indian Trade Society, the G.D.P of the country grew by 12% once a trade...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, even so, for example, for instance, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99756097561 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66341575092 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492682926829 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8596742495 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0625 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0948999657426 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343950362971 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341966918145 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565807086652 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188542514729 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.