In social situations, some people believe that it is better to be a good listener than a good talker. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of being a listener or a talker in social situations and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of acquiring information by good listening is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the art of eloquence can be a plus, and I will analyze both views throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, accurate listening to others' speech can provide people with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the full attention to raised topics, as well as communicating respect, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience as a teacher, I found that students who have more concentration in my speech are obviously more successful than their counterparts. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both better relationships and greater clarity apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, many people and I think that being a great speaker increases the consequences of attracting the attention of audiences. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of having a sense of power could relate to this reality that the demerits of avoiding communication pertaining to the lack of confidence. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of expressing feelings through talking. As an example, new research undertaken by UCLA University asserts that 85% of successful leaders have an impressive ability in speaking.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that balancing between being a good listener and a good speaker based on the situation can be so helpful. Not only do the advantages of getting information completely prove the significance of full consideration as a listener, but also pinpoint an attractive speech implication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-29 | Behnaz fallah | 64 | view |
| 2020-09-06 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | gude sah | 54 | view |
- People dispute travel is or is not a component of a quality education Some believe travel is overrated What is your opinion 77
- Do you agree that privatization of public sector undertakings is beneficial to society 68
- Some people believe that there has been no major development in humanity with the rising number of child abuse cases Is it a lack of education 88
- As national services which one deserve to receive more financial support education or health 88
- Students can obtain information of academic subject from online the printed books and articles and discussion with their teachers and their peers Which one is the most reliable source 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, i think, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38333333333 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.245199874 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0452704386 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.583333333 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268835362387 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765943996333 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788318536739 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144489055304 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076425402846 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.