Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea.Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a controversial question about whether young people are qualified enough to take significant governmental positions or not. From my point of view, these positions should be reserved for capable candidates, regardless of their age.
On the one hand, some advocate the view that the elderly should take the high-ranking positions have their own justifications. First and foremost, senior employees accumulated considerable specialized knowledge and practical experience through years of working. As a result, they are capable of making important decisions such as making policies or international negotiating, etc. Moreover, the young are considered as immature and indecisive as well as do not attain valuable experiences to be the leaders of nations, who can run and make their countries developed.
On the other hand, young leaders could have positive influences on both the nation and the community. First, they are enthusiastic and ambitious as well as creative and innovative when approaching issues. Evidently, young leaders are not confined to conventions and are willing to try various solutions to tackle national issues. Furthermore, they are physically stronger which enables them to shoulder great responsibilities and work under pressure better than the older ones. Lastly, young people promoted to important positions in government administrations could encourage the youth to engage in civic and political affairs as well as positively contribute to their community to develop a progressive and civilized society.
In conclusion, while voting experienced people to hold important positions in government agencies is worth considering, I am firmly convinced that talented individuals should be given chances and promoted to take leadership roles, despite their age.
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will use up the world s resources Do you agree or disagree 67
- There are more advertisements aimed at children Some people believe that they have negative effects on children and should be banned Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation s history However some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices How important is it to maintain old build 78
- Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea Discuss both views and give your opinion 93
- Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...run and make their countries developed. On the other hand, young leaders could h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78867924528 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19049853203 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630188679245 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2263625997 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157705312778 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527270743454 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501710816165 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963033357952 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238941175176 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.