When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
Each oldEach old buildings stand on ground all have their own distinctive history. It is a valuable treasure for us to preserve them and it will be regretful for us if we remove them from the ground to develop for modern purposes. Therefore, I consider that modern development should not be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings, except those countries which are struggling with poverty.
First, old buildings that stand on ground have many features documenting our ancestors’ lives at that time. Many of them have instructive meanings such as a castle or fort, which teach us how perilous is the war. We can retrospect our ancestor’s lives by entering these old buildings. For example, Provintia, a national monument castle in Taiwan, is made by Dutch when they come to Taiwan in the 17 century. It was a business center at that time, so we can realize that how people live at that time and what business do they do.
Moreover, for those countries which already have a sound foundation for the economy, they should preserve those old buildings. Those old buildings not only can transform into museums to earn money but also can present their cultural power. It can appeal to lots of tourists to come to their countries to experience the different cultures and the wisdom of ancestors. It is a wonderful plan to those countries. Therefore, there is no idea for them to keep insisting modern development should be precedent over the preservation of old buildings.
However, some countries still struggle against poverty can partly put modern development to be precedent over preservation. Because they need to feed themselves, it is still the most important thing for them. Without a doubt, modern development is the best way to consolidate their financial foundation. It can provide plenty of jobs for them to feed themselves. However, it doesn’t mean that they can destroy all old buildings to transform them into factories or commercial buildings. They still need to preserve these old buildings to make their citizens know that what environment do their ancestors live in in the past. In this way, they will be more cherish to their modern lives.
In contrast to the statement, I cannot agree that modern development should be precedence over the preservation of historic buildings, except for poverty countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-29 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-06 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | swetha_14r | 54 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Teyyub | 50 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- The best way to know a city you visit for the first time and only have a short time to stay 1 historical sites 2 shop and markets 3 local restaurants Cafe 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 608, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...hat environment do their ancestors live in in the past. In this way, they will be mor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, except for, for example, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07493540052 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84394600825 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49354005168 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9994664491 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5238095238 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370174388242 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117085495633 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111491657775 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256912928533 0.150359130593 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120450488047 0.0667264976115 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.