Some people believe that the world is changing for the better. Some argue that things are changing for the worse. Which statement do you agree with?
In recent decades, the world has undergone dreadful changes that drove humanity to the verge of collapse. The fast pace of life has revealed the changes for the worse of human society. From my perspective, I am in favour of the latter statement.
Nature has long been demolished by humankind to satisfy the desire of making profit. It has recently resulted in an alarming environmental degradation, prominently the event of rising sea level. Animals are losing habitats to humans, many of which have died due to starvation. Biodiversity has also been deteriorating with several species living on the brink of extinction. Humanity has prioritized personal interest over the existence of animals living out there in nature, sabotaging the balance of nature which can passively do harm to human beings.
Moreover, 2020 has witnessed a fearful eruption of COVID-19 pandemic with millions of deaths reported. Initially, the governments have not managed to deal with the situation immediately, defying the potential threats of the infectious virus which consequently put the world in commotion. The staggering economy has led to unemployment and the service economy has gone into a tailspin. A massive number of hospitality chains have been forced to close down by virtue of lack of funds and customers. The pandemic has shaken humanity to its foundation and has yet to show any reduction.
Unstable political regimes around the world have also drowned the world with threats, namely the political affairs of the United States of America. The insurrection has striked a critical hit to America, deeply dividing the society with hatred and madness. The event of Joe Biden elected as the 46th President has infuriated Trump’s supporters with chaos and confusion, domestic terrorism has put the USA on the downfall.
To draw a fair conclusion, the world is indeed falling apart with problems existing right in front of our eyes. There is a little chance of reversing the problem unless humanity stands united and be strong.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-07 | abread | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-04 | Tang Phuong | 92 | view |
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space for example traveling to the Moon and to other planets However others disagree and think governments should spend this money on our basic needs on Earth Discus 89
- i 78
- i 84
- An increasing number of people are buying what they need online What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies 84
- i 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22461538462 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83862788756 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1585356178 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160437727563 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419377456286 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494041934224 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083475814043 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600486661898 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.