Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work, but some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Discuss with examples or cases.
Recently, the phenomenon of concentrating on study or life experience for students and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning knowledge from the education system is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the balance between life experience and learning through studying or work can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, getting required information as a student or an employee can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of work experience, as well as skilled graduated, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I learned colossal skills in my field. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both comprehensive education system and the work environment apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, obtaining vital skills for a life by doing different activities might increase the consequences of enhancing concept of life. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of humanity could relate to this reality that the demerits of criminal behaviors pertain to the lack of understanding the meaning of life. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of kindness among workplaces is correlated negatively with single dimental life. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of volunteers activities.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of balancing between travels, studying and working far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of considering all aspect prove the significance of and interaction with other students, but also pinpoint communication implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-08 | Behnaz fallah | 80 | view |
- The illiterates of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write but those who cannot learn unlearn and relearn Agree or Disagree 85
- Some people believe that there has been no major development in humanity with the rising number of child abuse cases Is it a lack of education 88
- There are numerous after class activities for students Is it good or not 88
- In social situations some people believe that it is better to be a good listener than a good talker Do you agree or disagree 64
- Do you agree that privatization of public sector undertakings is beneficial to society 68
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60869565217 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23719214474 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642140468227 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5623834823 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.75 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107077800472 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352302713697 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246248001202 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587219143828 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136901535021 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60869565217 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23719214474 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642140468227 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5623834823 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.75 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107077800472 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352302713697 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246248001202 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587219143828 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136901535021 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.