Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, the phenomenon of museums’ admission fees and its corresponding impacts have sparked massive debates. In this regard, apart from remarkable benefits of paying money to enter museums, some people believe that admission of museums must be free. In my view, charging people to visit museums can benefit both historical objects and museums together, although we shouldn’t lose sight of the others’ opinion.
Obviously, to visit a considerable number of museums around the world, individuals have to purchase tickets of certain amount of money. These admission fees could spend on many different purposes. For example, museums can support new archaeological excavations to unearth new historical objects. In addition, funds which gather based on these fees pave the way for museums to recruit experts to rehabilitate damaged objects.
Moreover, charging people to enter museums also benefits the museum itself. Doing some refurbishments in museums’ buildings and construction of extra facilities for visitors could be possible via entrance charges. What’s more, authorities of museums should not neglect to security of buildings, thus spending a little proportion of entrance fees on installing more secure equipment to protect historical objects of exhibitions seems sensible decision.
On the other hand, others are of the opinion that individuals must not pay fees to visit galleries and museums. They claim that youths will encourage to spend more time on visiting museums if they don’t need to pay for admission. Consequently, it is likely that they will be more interested in their own traditions and historical periods, and more familiar with other nations’ cultures. Likewise, through visiting museums, a number of teenagers would be convinced to pursue such disciplines as history and archaeology for their future educations.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I am inclined to support the idea that the merits of charging people for museums’ admission far outweigh its downsides. We can ponder about which one is more sensible: paying $10 to eat a burger in an evening for pleasure while you are not so hungry or to visit marvelous objects of the ancients?
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ey. These admission fees could spend on many different purposes. For example, museums can supp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
.... They claim that youths will encourage to spend more time on visiting museums if they d...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, likewise, moreover, so, thus, while, apart from, for example, in addition, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47076023392 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9151401566 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7293642864 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.9375 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375672926636 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120482964898 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730958324466 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208843534661 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643060403594 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ey. These admission fees could spend on many different purposes. For example, museums can supp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
.... They claim that youths will encourage to spend more time on visiting museums if they d...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, likewise, moreover, so, thus, while, apart from, for example, in addition, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47076023392 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9151401566 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7293642864 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.9375 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375672926636 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120482964898 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730958324466 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208843534661 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643060403594 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.