The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americas in two of the years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate some sets of data relating to marriage in America during the 30-year period, from 1970 to 2000.
As seen from the first chart, the number of marriages remained stable in the first ten years, but then slightly fell from 2.5 millions to 2 millions in 2000. There were, however, some fluctuations in divorce rates. Between 1970 and 1980, there was a slight increase of nearly 0.5 millions; but that figure began to drop during the following years, finally reaching 1 million in 2000, equal to that in the beginning. But generally, the marriage rate was always higher than that of divorce.
The second chart offers a more accurate insight into the different marital status of adult Americans. Being married was the dominant one throughout the whole period, even though it underwent a slight decrease of over 10 percent. Widowed adults also declined a little bit, while people who were divorced and never married tend to grow more over the years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-01 | Atefeh 1248 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 84
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Comments
Marriage is a beautiful…
Marriage is a beautiful journey that requires constant effort, understanding, and compromises from both partners. It is very important to invest time and energy in the development of the relationship in order to create a strong foundation. However, it is important to recognize that sometimes divorce is the best solution for a healthier and happier life. At DivorceNYOnline.com, we provide the support and guidance you need to navigate the complexities of divorce and help people move forward with confidence.
Visit our website https://divorcenyonline.com/
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...percent. Widowed adults also declined a little bit, while people who were divorced and nev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9509202454 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34773020243 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674846625767 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7134346547 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170875315283 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714337387657 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484420287261 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119799253306 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361162544527 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.