The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph provides information about the number of social networking sites used by citizens in Canada between 2014 and 2015. The data is in the percentage.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given bar chart that two or more social sites, which used by people in Canada increased, while people who used only one social site, which decreased in a given period.
In 2014, there were more than 20% of people, who do not use any social media sites in Canada, which declined slightly 1% in the next year. 36% of users on one social platform site in 2014, which decreased to 28% in the following year. Moreover, people who used two sites were increased by nearly 1% in 2015 as compared with their past.
Furthermore, in 2014, there were around 12%, 5%, and 2% of people, who used three, four, and five social sites in Canada. The users of three, four, and five social sites rose sharply by 4%, 3%, and 2% in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Hanabi | view | |
| 2022-01-27 | Chloe Pham | view | |
| 2021-10-06 | Hamza khan12 | 67 | view |
- Charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006 73
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 84
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52694610778 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17417225443 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4393085112 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313995723436 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146987733521 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105905135643 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217905512555 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835299777749 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.