Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
In the present globalized world today, some arguments among communities that wealthy countries have better accept skilled and competent workers from undeveloped countries. I personally disagree with this proponent.
On the one hand, there actually seems to have some advantages that can be figured from this idea. First of all, it is able to be an immediate measure to tackle the lack of employees in rich countries. For example, the proportion of overage workers poses a profound threat to the socio-economic of Japan, therefore the variety of skilled and knowledgeable aboard employees such as people from Thailand, Vietnam plays a vital role in this measure. Moreover, in terms of developing countries, this prevailing development brings numerous financial benefits such as foreign money resources, trading opportunities... For instance, the fast-growing employment quality of Vietnam barely based on employment exporting. Having said that, the experiences and knowledge that an employee gain from rich countries have contributed much to the adequate field in Vietnam. Notwithstanding, I reckon that this idea should be promoted in a controlled way.
On the other hand, it would be various potential disadvantaged against this proponent. Firstly, this causes some significant threats to the social security to local nations such as the chaos in the workforce market and the enormous emigrate problems. For example, the leading countries in the world as the USA have to reinforce the laws to restrict the outbreaking number of emigrating waves to this country because there witnessed numerous amounts of crimes and strikes from foreign employees. Secondly, it is difficult for wealthy countries to appraise the capability of aboard employees because of the gap between the training and education system of each country. For instance, it is a challenge for the political system of the USA to asset equally and precisely employees for southeast Asia.
In conclusion, there are various not only benefits but also drawbacks of exporting workforces from poor countries to wealthy ones. However, I strongly believe that humans will figure a comprehensive measure to this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-19 | Mohsensnake | 67 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environments such as the South Pole What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... comprehensive measure to this issue.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, for example, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51044776119 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01618711591 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570149253731 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.777639998 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.375 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0625 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258266811042 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076768043804 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627435810631 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15008549347 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289560968076 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.