What can governments do to encourage children to eat more healthily?
Write at least 250 words to discuss the topic.
A topical issue in modern society is children’s diet. This will cause risk of many serious problems if children do not control their diet every day. However, the governments still can apply several measures which make children have a balanced diet.
Nowadays, these significant changes has begun showing up adverse effect on our health. Children from many countries are suffering from obesity, fatness and fatness related diseases such as heart disease, cancer and sugar. As a result it is imperative that people should fight collectively hand in hand against this huge problem before it poses a threat to people’s health system. There are two main methods why the governments can do to encourage children to eat healthy food. Firstly, governments can levy a high tax on fast food chains to reduce fast food consumption from children. To elaborate, when the price of junk food is costly, children have to eat more healthy food, such as organic food and homemade food. Secondly, the governments can show negative effects of unhealthy food on TV and social media. As a result, children perceive that they have to eat more healthily to prevent diseases and have high resistance.
A further way is that the governments should prohibit promotion from fast food restaurants. Commercials for fast food often target young children through offering inducements, such as the toys in the happy meal at McDonalds for example. The children are persuaded to demand a happy meal, yet often do not necessarily want to eat the food contained in it. The only thing they want is the toy. If advertising junk food were forbidden, the number of children consuming pre-cooked meals would be reduced.
In conclusion, children’s healthy diet is a topic which is very relevant to contemporary modern. Nevertheless, I believe that the best solution is by placing a tax on fast food and making it more expensive than healthy raw foods, children would began to eat more healthily. If additionally the advertising of quick service restaurants were banned, the number of obese children would decrease even more drastically.
- Modern lifestyles are completely different from the way people lived in the past Someone think the changes have been very positive while others believe they have been negative Discuss both these points of view and give your opinion 61
- Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by wealthy parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respond 56
- Today the quality of life in large cities is decreasing Discuss the causes and solutions 89
- In some countries there has been an increase in the number of parents who educate their children themselves at home instead of sending them to school Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uch as heart disease, cancer and sugar. As a result it is imperative that people s...
^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'begin'
Suggestion: begin
... than healthy raw foods, children would began to eat more healthily. If additionally ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13702623907 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78927851402 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7513929416 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7368421053 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0526315789 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242471527142 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811825774046 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633746575205 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14853606552 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313873083654 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.