Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)
Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given line chart gives information about acid levels, which are measured by low pH values, produced by consumption of Sweets food, Which may cause tooth decay.
Overall, it can be seen that there are three sources of sugar that can spoil the teeth, namely, fruit sugar, cane sugar, and honey, for 40 minutes for each one. Therefore, cane sugar brings about the most damage to the teeth, followed by fruit sugar and honey.
The pH level in the mouth at which tooth decay occurs is 5.5 or below. The lower the pH value is, the more acidic the mouth environment becomes, so tooth decay becomes increasingly likely. Cane sugar is the worst offender in this regard, which can decrease the pH level from 7 to 3 in the first five minutes after eating sweets food, and it takes another 25 minutes to return to the healthier levels (ph 5.5 or above).
Another type is fruit sugar, which can cause a decline in the mouth's pH level from 7 to just 4.2 five minutes after the consumption. The pH stays below 5.5 for 20 minutes. Finally, the safest source of these three sweets food is honey because it only lowers the pH value beneath 5.5 in the first five minutes and can go back to the acceptable acidity levels less than 15 minutes after eating.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | cupinsiuway | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-21 | Wisnu Legowo | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | Hamza khan1 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | khuekhue | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-13 | Dida18 | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in the ownership of households electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in one country between 1920 and 2019 73
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In the future nobody wiil buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sweets'' or 'sweet's'?
Suggestion: sweets'; sweet's
... in the first five minutes after eating sweets food and it takes another 25 minutes to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, may, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41333333333 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07338930495 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497777777778 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 225.0 22.4926829268 1000% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 993.0 112.824112599 880% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 225.0 22.9334400587 981% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 34.0 5.23603664747 649% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334678386753 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.334678386753 0.103423049105 324% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238341803926 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13033733129 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 111.8 13.2329268293 845% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -139.98 61.2550243902 -229% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 88.7 10.3012195122 861% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.78 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.18 8.06136585366 213% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 92.0 10.9970731707 837% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 92.0 11.0658536585 831% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.