In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Thanks to Internet access, in today’s world, people get to reach anything they want without spending any money. It is assumed that people will no longer purchase printed books and newspapers in the future due to the online free materials on the Internet. However, I disagree with this statement for several reasons.
Some people think that in the future, people are more likely to read books and newspapers on the Internet, not spending money on them. Their strongest argument is that the Internet has so much to offer, leaving its users choiceless in so many cases. You can indeed find anything you want with just a couple of buttons on the Internet without spending any money and people are probably would not like to spend any while there is a chance to buy for free. However, this is not always the case, especially with people who do not want to take their health for granted. The chance of losing eyesight is much higher in people who read constantly from the screen of the computer than people who go for reading printed books or newspapers.
It is also argued that given the popularity of the Internet, most people would like to stay updated about the news. Therefore, it is predicted that online reading will take almost full advantage of printed books and newspapers. Nevertheless, in my opinion, for some people buying printed books and newspapers will always remain to be a better choice. In fact, when people buy printed books or newspapers, they always read till it gets finished. Besides, many people wish to spend on tangible things rather than buying ones that can only stay on screens.
In conclusion, while some people feel, in the future, people will not buy printed books and newspapers, I still believe that there are people who do not like to read books or newspapers from the screen of the computer even if they are for free.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 73
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 70
- Some people believe that having instant messaging apps like WhatsApp or Viber on our smartphones has improved our communication Others feel that it has only damaged the way we communicate Discuss both vies and give your own opinion 81
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 61
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79192546584 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37063137937 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465838509317 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8114530732 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.214285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271364644934 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112469678596 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694925371969 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204309087987 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480678011544 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.