in most countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Fast food has made an enormous difference in people eating habits all over the world. Mostly in developed countries, we can easily see the fast-food chains in every corner. A bevy of fast-food restaurants has raised the question about the negative or positive effects they could bring. From my perspective, fast-food development has more drawbacks than its benefits.
From the beginning, we will take a closer look at the benefits that fast food can bring. Firstly, the price of this sort of food is relatively low. If we have 5 dollars in our pocket, of course, we will not have enough money for high-price restaurants or any organic foods at all. In this case, french fries or a greasy hamburger will be the best alternative options. Because of the low cost and the delicious tastes, fast food is always a good choice. Secondly, instant food needs no time to prepared. It is a significant benefit, especially for bustling people. To prepare the crispy chicken nuggets or juicy beef hamburgers, we put those into the microwave for 1 minute. As a result, a yummy meal has done quickly and tastily.
However, it seems that the disadvantages of fast food outweigh the advantages entirely. First of all, the process of making fast food is insecurity. Because of the low prices, we should ask ourselves about the quality of greasy breakfast we pack to work every day. With highly processed, mass-produced food, uncostly, it is also necessary to consider the human factor and the possibility of errors caused by the production rate, such as the use of rotten meat or hair or other objects found in food. Another negative side of fast food is that it causes the deterioration of public health. There is plenty of well-conducted research demonstrating the various adverse health effect of eating and overeating fast food. Junk food high in sodium, carbs, and sugar can lead to increased dental cavities, headaches, or acne outbreaks in short-term effects. What are the adverse effects in the long term? Eating a poor quality diet high in junk food is linked to a higher risk of obesity, depression, digestive issues, heart disease, and stroke. More seriously, it will cause cancer and lead to early death. For example, as we have known, fast food has become a staple of American culture, it could have adverse effects on America's health systems. The growth of fast food in America seems to coincide with the development of obesity. Moreover, to make fast food tastier and quicker-prepared, the manufacturers have added food preservatives and additives in convenience food. These factors could have a detrimental impact on customer health.
To sum up, we have already known the benefits that fast food could bring, but we should aware of their drawback side of it. To have a healthy diet, we must take the harmful effects of junk food into consideration to make the right decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-24 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-16 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-13 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-01 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
| 2024-05-01 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
- 14 Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 84
- many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 73
- 1 Many criminals re offend after they have been punished Why do some people continue to commit crimes after being punished and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 70
- some people believe that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minium legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain Others say films should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in short, of course, sort of, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2392.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 485.0 315.596192385 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93195876289 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77316445006 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 176.041082164 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560824742268 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 16.0721442886 180% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8596058333 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4827586207 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.724137931 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93103448276 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233424488486 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717256531977 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651382583297 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147908871617 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676527408361 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.