Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries. Why is this the case? Is it a positive development?
It has become common for developing countries to focus on improving their tourism industry. There are some factors that might have led to this phenomenon, and I believe that it is a negative trend.
There are a number of causes why developing countries are concentrating on tourism. First of all, it is a great source of income for them. This is because foreign visitors bring in hard currency, which will be spent on local hotels, cafes, restaurants and many other attractions, all of which will benefit the economy if they prosper. Besides bringing an influx of money, tourism also creates job opportunities for people. This is because in order for these businesses to function, they need people; in effect, the rate of unemployment in the host country decreases and standards of life in those countries improves.
In my view, this is a negative trend principally for environmental and cultural reasons. In the first place, tourist visit well-known destinations, resorts, and other natural areas, and leave rubbish and food leftovers. This, in turn, creates pollution that is a matter for concern. To expand the issue of pollution, tourists use airplanes, automobiles and trains to reach their destination, which exhaust large amounts of deleterious gases. From cultural perspective, local people’s traditions may be damaged when they come across people from different nationalities with different outlooks. Changing clothing trends in developing countries such as Uzbekistan is an excellent case in point.
In conclusion, developing nations are prioritizing tourism industry for financial and employment reasons. Nevertheless, I am of the view that this trend is largely a negative one because it impacts on culture and environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | UP | 84 | view |
- Some people think that individuals and companies rather than the government should pay for cleaning pollution To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Money for postgraduate research is limited Therefore some people think financial support from governments should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects Do you agree or disagree 67
- Computers are increasingly used in education In which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important 80
- Some people think that all school students should learn a foreign language while others think that students should not be required to learn it if they do not have talent for it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reaching
...s use airplanes, automobiles and trains to reach their destination, which exhaust large ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, well, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my view, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4375 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0268384809 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6919923033 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259554452809 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825607528742 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759336322258 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153559090694 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191582865686 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.