In 20 years from now on, students will not use printed books any more
In sophisticated today’s world where we live, people’s life has been undergone many changes, and this patter is continuous because technology is progressing increasingly. In this circumstance, some people think in 20 years from now students no longer use printed books. On the other hand, some people believe that students will read the printed books in the future as the present. I, personally, concur with the latter group for two main reasons that I will elaborate on which in the following paragraphs.
One exquisite reason which comes to mind is that if students want to eliminate printed books, they inevitably should use electronic books and inline books which are not completely useful. Literature is rife of studies which have shown adverse effects of using smartphone, tablet, and laptop. Students need to read an inordinate amount of material and books in order to pass their course. Therefore, if they eliminate printed books and turn to online and electronic versions, they should look at the digital screen for hours. In this situation, they are more likely to lose their eyes and body health. To elucidate on, while being a student, I had this exam that my teacher in the last moment added new material. Since I could not get that file printed, red the PDF on my smartphone. At the end of the day, I experienced an irritating feeling in my eyes. So, I believe, it would be like a disaster for students to shift from printed books to digital ones.
Second, printed books provide students with the chance of taking notes and highlighting the most important notions in the margin of the paper. It goes without saying that taking notes while studying is efficiently contributive to make a profound understanding of the concepts. Taking note, students can consolidate their knowledge and summarize the all-important part of each page which helps them to save time when they have an exam. In this way, they only need to review the notes and get a good score. Apparently, writing notes with a pen or pensile is much more convenient than writing by touch on a smartphone or a tablet. To illustrate, as soon as I bought a tablet, I put my paper books over, and start reading PDFs on my tablet. When I found that I could not easily take note on each page, I turn back to my paper books because using them I was more productive.
All in all, having two mentions reasons into account, I believe that in years from now, students will read printed books as the same as now. In this way, not only can they take advantage of writing notes in the margin of the paper, but they also do not hit their health with harmful radiation of digital devices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-20 | memi00 | 76 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | memi00 | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | edsonsimoes | 70 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | devvratjoshi | 60 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | devvratjoshi | 70 | view |
- tpo40 70
- Some people prefer to go and visit the tourist attractions where there are many people Others like the tourist attractions with fewer people which one do you prefer 89
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- there is no reasons to be impolite do you agree or disagree 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75324675325 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61725816296 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534632034632 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4440447947 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8181818182 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328497537612 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920386656423 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106978546009 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211129821915 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626571863356 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.