Today different types of robots are developed, which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work. Is this a positive or negative development
The modern world has witnessed the tremendous advancement in robots technologies that they are capable of helping human at work and at home. Personally, this development is significantly advantageous as it promises to bring about different benefits to the mankind and the society.
On the one hand, a diverse range of types of robots has been utilized at home to alleviate the burdens of doing household chores. Specifically, robots have been developed to address different household tasks without humans’ management, allowing individuals to save their time and energy and shifting their attention to more vital tasks. In fact, it is prevalent to use robots to wash the clothes and do the dishes which in turn reduces the stress of completing time-consuming and strenuous household chores. Consequently, having robots helping humans at home is tremendously beneficial.
On the other hand, nowadays, robots have been adopted to replace manpower in some workplace due to their superiority in productivity. In detail, robots have been designed to supersede humans in physical capacity, being able to work in toxic enviroment and achieve arduous tasks in shorter time. This helps to eliminate the negative impacts on the employees’ health and allow the human resources to be allocated to more suitable jobs. For example, car manufacturing factories have utilised robots to automate the process and reduce the need for massive number of employees.
To conclude, despite controversial opinions on determining the impacts of robots, I endorse the hypothesis that they would make different levels of positive contribution to the modern world. While robots can address household tasks without human’s support, they are also utilised in the workplace to achieve higher efficiency.
- The process for recycling plastic bottles 78
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transports To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- More and more people in the city live in home with small spaces or no outdoor areas Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly affected by economic success Others think that there are completely different factors that are more important Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Instead of requiring primary school students to do experiments themselves schools should only allow them to watch experiments demonstrated by teachers To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, while, for example, in fact, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50364963504 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01475759995 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583941605839 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4797112792 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228816183187 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858789596744 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537193169788 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143327902869 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761894094223 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.