More and more people in the city live in home with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Is this a positive or negative development.
As a result of prohibitive cost and other financial-related issues, living in places that are cramped or without outdoor areas has become increasingly prevalent among city dwellers. Personally, I hold the opinion that this is a detrimental development, as individuals may experience different negative consequences.
On the one hand, the cramped living spaces with no outdoor areas can have detrimental effects on the physical well-being of individuals. Specifically, those kinds of houses limit citizens’ engagement in physical movements because they have no room to place the essential equipment for such activities. Therefore, this sedentary lifestyle would result in serious health conditions such as heart diseases or obesity. Consequently, it is disadvantageous for people to live in small houses without outdoor areas.
On the other hand, city dwellers’ mental states might be adversely affected by living in houses with small or no outdoor spaces. It is scientifically proven that living in such places reduces the chance of individuals having friends to come over since they either feel ashamed of their living places or uncomfortable to have many people in small rooms. Besides, houses without outdoor areas would render people lower the frequencies of socializing with their neighbors. In this way, many psychological problems may develop as a result of feeling isolated or disconnected. The given explanation justifies the reason people should not choose to live in small places without outdoor spaces.
In conclusion, despite debatable schools of thought on determining the ultimate impacts of living in cramped houses without outdoor areas, I endorse the hypothesis that this development is disadvantageous since it has negative impacts on the physical and mental well-being of city dwellers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-15 | @hoangnguyen | 56 | view |
- Some people use the Internet for medical help instead of going to see the doctor Why Is it a positive or negative development 61
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 78
- In some cities the government is trying to reduce traffic for example by tax vehicles more on rush hour Is this a positive or negative development 61
- When people learn a foreign language all four listening reading speaking writing skills are equally important To what extent do you agree or disagree v 81
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transports To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64468864469 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16930053996 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534798534799 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1548325676 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.416666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320394410577 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122814101757 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594928945195 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192597012092 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497205127413 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.