Governments in major cities around the world spend enormous expenditure for restoration of old buildings. This money should be used for providing new housing and road development. Do you agree or disagree.
Preservation of old buildings requires metropolitans authorities to spend tremendous financial resources. Some individuals suggest that this source of investment should be allocated to the construction of new houses and streets. Personally, I agree with the notion because humans and society would experience different levels of advantages.
On the one hand, old buildings are no longer useful in urban settings. Specifically, as they were constructed a long time ago, they would fail to adopt the use of cutting-edge technology. As a result, these buildings do not possess the sophisticated and updated features in their structures and internal systems, leading to the inability to utilize natural resources such as light or wind, which will be a major demerit in the comparison with newly-built complexes. All in all, in the era of ever-increasing climate change, this type of buildings is not suitable for the demanding needs of modern people to be exploited, making them unworthy of restoration.
On the other hand, new plans to develop the housing and roads are critical to counter the transformation in cosmopolitan areas’ population. In fact, following the globalization and the development of technology, there is a huge surge in migration patterns, resulting in an influx of rural citizens to large cities. Therefore, more buildings are necessary to facilitate the need of people for accommodation. Also, this phenomenon requires more roads to make it easier for commuting and traveling. In addition, since the demolishing of old buildings is compulsory to provide space for the development of new houses and roads, it is essential to eliminate the demand for money to preserve the buildings. Consequently, these resources could be allocated to construct the houses and roads.
To conclude, despite the government's practice of allocating money to restore old buildings, I endorse the hypothesis that it should be invested in developing new houses and roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-01 | @hoangnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | @hoangnguyen | 84 | view |
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transports To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Governments in major cities around the world spend enormous expenditure for restoration of old buildings This money should be used for providing new housing and road development Do you agree or disagree 84
- Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think the newly built houses should be as same as the old house style in local areas Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45098039216 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25735529769 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591503267974 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2897025418 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380109845225 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111505609534 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737046538779 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214362989595 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569460223684 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.