The world of work is rapidly changing and people cannot depend on having the same job and the same working conditions for life. What are the causes of this rapid change? How can people prepare for their future work life?
The modern world has witnessed drastic transformations in employment, making it impossible to keep the same job and working environments. Personally, I endorse the hypothesis that technological development implements this phenomenon. Individuals must strengthen their agility in order to be ready for such evolution.
Regarding the cause, this rapid change in work is the result of many inventions in technology. Nowadays, robots are designed to supersede manpower in physical capabilities, being able to work in hasty conditions and achieve tasks in a shorter time. Therefore, it is inevitable that many domains are no longer in need of human resources, reducing the job opportunities on a large scale. As a result, many people cannot afford to have one profession in the same working conditions for the rest of their lives.
About the preparation for individuals’ career paths, a diversity of practical knowledge and skills and the ability to improvise are of utmost importance. Specifically, improvisation renders individuals make immediate adaptations and responses to the ever-evolving world of work. Besides, profound knowledge helps people to finesse the up-coming trends and the possession of manifold skills makes them suitable for a wide range of working fields. Consequently, the profundity in understanding and skills and improvising ability are three main things that people should concentrate on to enhance.
In conclusion, despite debatable schools of thought on determining the cause and method of preparation for the ever-changing world of work, I hold the opinion that cutting-edge technology has a huge impact on it. In order to be well-prepared for the dramatic change, people should make themselves knowledgeable, adept, and acute.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-16 | @hoangnguyen | 61 | view |
- Some people think the newly built houses should be as same as the old house style in local areas Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Governments in major cities around the world spend enormous expenditure for restoration of old buildings This money should be used for providing new housing and road development Do you agree or disagree 78
- When people learn a foreign language all four listening reading speaking writing skills are equally important To what extent do you agree or disagree v 81
- In some cities the government is trying to reduce traffic for example by tax vehicles more on rush hour Is this a positive or negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64150943396 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36405305734 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607547169811 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4391613949 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391781543934 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120751136329 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873813068237 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213830666474 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626320522413 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.