Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. Do you agree or disagree?
These days, we are living in a world where crime by young people is a heated topic and often discussed. It is commonly believed that immature offenders should be punished the same as adults. I strongly disagree with young people committing an adverse crime have the same harsh penalty as adults. In this essay will explain the reasons behind my arguments of this opinion.
On the one hand, some people think that juveniles should receive the same sentences as adults for severe felonies. It is apparent that youngster delinquency is an alarming issue in this day and age, and server punishments can act as a deterrent to those who intend to commit a crime. Even many people assume that if keeping these young offenders locked up in jail for longer, it would make society safer. Furthermore, when young wrongdoers only receive lenient sentences compared to adult offenders. They may not acknowledge their unlawful behavior and adverse consequence that leads the chance of their reoffending is exceptionally high.
On the other hand, I assume that young people should not receive the same punishment as adults. One of the main reasons could be that juveniles are not sufficiently educated which means that it is unjustified for them to receive the same punishment as adults. For example, some young people are forced to do illegal by adults or mimic the behavior of adults. Secondly, if young people were locked away in jail for a long time, they are likely to re-offend. Since the carrier's options available to someone who enters the workforce in their 30s with a criminal record are minimal. Therefore, after being released from prison, the young offenders will face not only many difficulties in seeking jobs but also prejudice from society.
In conclusion, in my view that I disagree with young offenders should be punished the same as adults. I hope that society will give them a second chance to make up their mistakes and to have a better life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-09 | Raspreet s. | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | Raspreet s. | 47 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | Harman97 | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | tieuquynh | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ong time, they are likely to re-offend. Since the carriers options available to someo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir mistakes and to have a better life.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91818181818 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58063886852 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521212121212 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8868979967 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351787755921 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116345892393 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882644299408 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22482906592 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404774904872 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.