Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities.
To what extent do you agree?
One issue generating much argument is who should provide social and sports facilities for the community. While a number of individuals argue that this is the job of corporate organizations, I contend that it is not their responsibility, rather, this is mainly the task of the government. However, corporate entities can contribute their own quota as they wish.
It behoves the government to construct playgrounds and football practice pitches for the citizenry. This constitutes what an elected authority owes those it is supposed to serve and this is what the citizens deserve. In other words, it is part of the government's social contract with the people. For instance, there are usually ministries under the government for social and sports development, they usually cater to these needs. Moreover, these ministries have a budget every year, hence, money should have been provided.
On the other hand, conglomerates can choose to give back to their communities. Where a business entity feels that it has benefited from the community it is located, it can offer charity to the people. This can be by sponsoring the provision of sports arenas for use by the locals, or by upgrading existing facilities. For example, Shell has helped to build training grounds in some Nigerian communities, where young footballing talents are groomed, who will tomorrow become superstars. To put it another way, an organization can decide to donate a mini stadium as part of its corporate social responsibility.
In conclusion, although people say companies should be the ones to provide sports complexes for the inhabitants of their community, I opine that it is a duty meant for the government. Nonetheless, business entities can choose to augment the effort of the government in this regard.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 56 | view |
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 61
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 73
- Planting trees is very important for the environment Some people say trees should be planted in vacant areas of cities and towns while others say housing facilities should be built instead Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, moreover, nonetheless, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26223776224 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01559389559 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6057156487 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222645429401 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688985782418 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808765404639 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136014700724 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338870249675 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.