It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that taxpayers’ money should be allocated to improve residents’ health rather than to focus on treating patients. I strongly agree with this opinion since disease prevention is much cheaper, and being healthy is always better than being hospitalised.
First of all, knowing how to lead a healthy life is more cost-effective than spending massive amounts of money curing a particular disease. For instance, the cost of a balanced diet containing fundamental nutrients including meat, fish and vegetables is within the financial capacity of even the underprivileged. In contrast, the expenditure on medical treatments of such serious diseases as cancer and diabetes often costs an arm and a leg, which would be an enormous problem for the majority of residents, but cannot guarantee the possibility of being completely cured. Therefore, instead of
spending a huge sum of money on treatment, allocation of the governments’ budget on promoting people’s health is deemed a much wiser investment.
Secondly, it is more beneficial to be fit and healthy than to be confined to the hospital ward surrounded by drugs and medical devices. In fact, maintaining positive eating habits or doing physical exercises, despite spending a decent amount of time at the initial stage, yields more favourable results than losing parts of one’s life into being trapped with crutches or heavily dependent on medical treatments. For example, people would definitely not choose to have chemotherapy if they have chances to protect themselves by leading a healthy lifestyle.
In conclusion, prevention is always better than cure, and thus promoting healthy living to prevent the upstream causes of ill health is the better budget spending.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-02 | nguyen.ttn1998 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some business to move from cities to rural areas Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day 7 days a week To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... completely cured. Therefore, instead of spending a huge sum of money on treatmen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44649446494 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03044378731 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634686346863 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8582992089 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.6 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228893022722 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869244144376 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573715794552 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130492999441 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363262071653 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.