Human activities have negative effects on plants and animals species. Some people think it is too late to fix these issues. Others believe there are possible solutions to improve the situation.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some individuals are of the opinion that the excessive exploitations of human on flora and fauna have resulted in numerous adverse effects, while others think handling these problems is beyond people’s ability. In the scope of this essay, I will consider the rationale behind both perspectives before giving my opinion.
On the one hand, advocates of the former notion might have the following arguments. Firstly, heavy reliance on using fossil fuels to operate machines and vehicles has discharged the large amount of green house gas emission into the environmental nature. Once these toxic fumes have been absorbed into the atmosphere, they will not be processed as primitive fresh air because people have insufficiently had advanced technologies to deal with. Secondly, deforestation and burning forests to create agricultural lands that not only leads to soil erosion, but also causes serious floods. Consequently, many wildlife species have already vanished from the wildlife habitat and it is unviable to get them back.
On the other hand, proponents of the latter viewpoint put forth the following ideas. In terms of individuals, the world generates billion tons of solid waste including plastic and metal annually, which will have vast implications for plants and animals. Therefore, in lieu of using non-degradable materials, environmentally-friendly products can be the best options for consumers to preserve the healthy environment. From perspectives of government, the green campaigns of environmental conservation to raise awareness of people are completely urgent. Particularly, documentary films related to how damage humans have affected on the natural world that can be obvious illustrations to improve the resident’s awareness of the issue.
In conclusion, for certain individuals, the rescue plants and animals from destruction by humans can be impossible, however, I believe the great contribution from individuals and government is a promising plan to save the plants and animals from extinction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-25 | thanhlan0201 | 89 | view |
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary schools. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- the chart below shows male and female fitness membership in Thailand between 1985 and 2015 92
- The graph below shows the number of doctors per 1000 people in Cuba and US from 1975 to 2015 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...rms of individuals, the world generates billion tons of solid waste including plastic a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion, for certain individuals, the rescue plants and animals from destruction by h...
^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...destruction by humans can be impossible, however, I believe the great contributio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6875 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25450990892 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4142626547 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191793631878 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559000219448 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516583374503 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115661248706 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557651201249 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.