Some people believe that developing countries should concentrate on improving industrial skills whereas others argue that these countries should promote education first. Discuss the both viewpoints and give your own opinion.
It is thought that whether the government should focus on enhancing working skills or educational system for the community. In the scope of this essay, I believe there are several benefits of improving industrial skills while boosting education would be the top priority for the nation.
It is true that there are two main reasons why working skills for labours should be improved. Firstly, the workers, who lack specialized abiliy, are not appropriate for specialized industry such as automobile manufacturing or automation. Take Vietnam for this obvious example, automobile generating business like Vinfast has to hire experts from developing countries such as Europe or The USA to promote their company. Secondly, if the workers complete the training sessions or workshops, they will create more productivity for the company. As a result, the more high quality products the factories produce, the more money they generate for their nation.
Although industrial skills play an important role in the revenue of the country, I think that providing money for developing education is the long-term development. One reason is that thanks to the higher education , the employees will be provide basic knowledge as well as qualifications to apply the theory into practice. It is easier for theem to to create modern devices with advanced technology. Another reason is that education is also main role of socializing people and keep the community more stable. As well educated individuals abides by the laws, and it shapes the order in the society. Therefore, education is the best investment for people that is the key to move in the world.
In conclusion, albeit having great contributions to the national income, spending money on working skills is less important than education. Personally, education will be brought about stable and long-term developments for developing countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-14 | thanhlan0201 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | Duong Linh | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | Duong Linh | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | Duong Linh | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | dqhungdl | 92 | view |
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 67
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000
- The graph below shows the number of doctors per 1000 people in Cuba and US from 1975 to 2015 84
- In many large cities in the world the quality of life is decreasing What are the reasons for this Suggest some possible solutions 89
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n is that thanks to the higher education , the employees will be provide basic kno...
^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...y into practice. It is easier for theem to to create modern devices with advanced tec...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41016949153 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9066857644 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586440677966 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9132118465 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159186158626 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546019136492 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413249059318 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103625294816 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365245453819 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.