The use of software makes it unnecessary for people to know how to spell words correctly these days.
Do you agree with this statement
The growth of technology, especially in spelling software, is indeed impressive. Such a development is perceived to have rendered knowing how to spell an oblivious task. Personally, I strongly disagree with this assessment.
First and foremost, numerous activities in real life make knowing how to spell a necessity. Daily tasks such as listening to news and reading newspapers require people to understand and differentiate words that may sound the same but are spelt differently and inferred to different meanings. Likewise, activities such as making medicinal notes or filling out forms can only be conducted with a proper mastery over word spelling.
Furthermore, it is impossible to separate spelling from grammar or syntax as they are equally integral parts of a language’s acquisition. For this reason, in educational settings, learning activities and tests across most subjects are all designed to promote and assess one’s spelling ability in varying degrees.
Admittedly, software that aids spelling has become ubiquitous. After much reiteration, autocorrect, for instance, is now able to provide sensible word suggestions while many smart apps can transcribe audio files into texts with a high level of accuracy. This is the fundamental cause for their integration into most smart devices or computer programs which involve verbalizing information. Despite such convenience and popularity, software is only a supplementary option. Devices that have spelling aiding features are not constantly accessible. Furthermore, the current level of accuracy is still limited within a range of typical contexts, which makes the software less advantageous and applicable than one’s actual skill.
In brief, it is in my conviction that the increasing permeation of software does not lead to the eradication of spelling as the software can only at best accelerate the process. In contrast, knowing how to spell is a vital asset for each individual to use to meet endless practical purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-04 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-01 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
- People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction 89
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 61
- Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid leave believing this benefits the individual and the organization Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Comments
Thanks for the useful stats,…
Thanks for the useful stats, in a business environment every nuance is important. I decided to trust the professionals and used QAwerk's testing checklist for my business. This checklist helped me thoroughly test the website before launching it, making sure all pages load fast, links work, content displays correctly on different devices and browsers. It helped me create quality and high quality content.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 253, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...is a vital asset for each individual to use to meet endless practical purposes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, likewise, may, so, still, while, for instance, in brief, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59539473684 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08191033489 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644736842105 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0165580165 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28787444949 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084159007279 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041801443183 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147039221495 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337569036205 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.