In some cities, the government is trying to reduce traffic, for example by tax vehicles more on rush hour. Is this a positive or negative development?
In several urban areas, authorities are implementing changes to reduce traffic, specifically by taxing vehicles at a higher rate during peak hours. Personally, I believe this development is highly positive because humans and society would experience different levels of positivity.
On the one hand, the governments’ efforts to lower transport usage will help to protect the environment. In fact, it is widely known that transportation accounts for a considerable portion of fuels being used. Also, since cosmopolitan areas have witnessed a rise in the number of transports as a result of the growth in population, promulgating policies to decrease traffic can bring about a drop in fossil energy consumption. Besides, the emissions from cars are likely to fall dramatically. Consequently, the move towards lesser cities’ traffic can save natural resources and harness air pollution.
On the other hand, governments’ decision to lessen vehicle amounts may lead to a reduction in accidents. To be specific, accidents are usually associated with personal transports and traffic congestion, especially in the rush hours. For instance, by taxing vehicles more at this time, people can feel the urge to make use of public transport instead, reducing the number of vehicles on the roads and traffic jams. Therefore, accidents can decrease greatly.
To conclude, in regard to the current practice of hindering the proportion of vehicles in the cities, I endorse the hypothesis that this phenomenon is beneficial for its tremendous advantages. Not only it is able to save the nature and atmosphere but it also reduces accidents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-04 | @hoangnguyen | 61 | view |
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people use the Internet for medical help instead of going to see the doctor Why Is it a positive or negative development 61
- Some people think the newly built houses should be as same as the old house style in local areas Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Governments in major cities around the world spend enormous expenditure for restoration of old buildings This money should be used for providing new housing and road development Do you agree or disagree 78
- Museum and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts of the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in fact, as a result, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47619047619 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14858384785 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9750921568 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.153846154 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272366064243 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739916831531 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629854970454 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149597885897 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598473030544 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.