It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Having a trip to distant natural environment is not an unrealistic thing to do with tourists and scientists any more in the 4.0 eras with mushroomed technology. While this development may bring about some drawbacks beneficial effects, I assert that they are eclipsed the beneficial effects.
On the one hand, visiting unknown destinations can result in unpredictable consequence for tourists and scientists. It strikes on people who travel to these places that if they do not prepare sufficiently, they may be obliged to face risky situations and lead to substantial losses in terms of health and facilities. For instance, the North Pole usually has extremely low temperature, which can have adverse effects on travelers such as catching a flu, fever or cold. On top of that, tourists may be taken into untrusted travelling companies or organizations that can intimidating their safety.
On the other hand, satisfied experience and conducive environment for scientific research are the most two obvious advantages of the development. First off, tourists will have chances to revel in breathtaking scenery and adventurous activities which they will never have in normal entertaining places. People can broaden their knowledge by observing the flora and fauna of specific habitats. Visiting foreign countries or historical destinations may become too familiar with travelling lovers; thus, exploring faraway destinations is a totally new and unforgettable experience with them. Moreover, this development also plays a crucial role in conducting scientific experiments and research for scientists mostly in terms of climate changes and other global issues. For example, scientists succeeded in tracking and reconstructing climate trends and patterns by investigating the layers of the ice core in the North and South Pole. This directly suggests that a number of scientific research has been carried out successfully due to travelling to remote natural environment.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the advantages of travelling to distant natural habitat are more considerable than its disadvantages. However, people still should be aware of the importance of these places and have particular actions to preserve it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58579881657 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17425151706 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3298482778 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.866666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277715026419 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788688939076 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499801278588 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14430766699 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479088413546 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.