It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people suppose that it is necessary to construct large public spots such as squares or parks in all suburban and metropolitan areas. While I accept that these spaces play an important role in our society, I would argue that it is more crucial to invest money in some other important sectors such as medical care or education.
On the one hand, I agree that large public areas are important to countries. First of all, as there are big spaces in residential areas, this encourages people to do exercise more regularly. As a result, public health would be improved tremendously thanks to modern devices such as treadmills or exercise bikes being placed in parks and squares . Secondly, since these places could be designed and built magnificently, these places would become tourist attractions. This might help to promote the economy of these places by virtue of exchanging the local products with domestic and foreign travelers. For instance, Guom lake- a ubiquitous Vietnamese public space attracts a great number of tourists on a yearly basis, which creates many job opportunities for many local people.
However, I would argue that despite understanding the importance of public areas, it is unable to construct these big projects in all towns and cities. The most significant reason is that spending money on those constructions is a waste of our countries’ budget while other urgent sectors such as medical care or education need more investment. For example, when the literate rate is still low in some areas, improving this problem should be prioritized in lieu of investing money in building public spaces. Moreover, since these public spots require large land, this would narrow the residential areas of the population. At the same time, overpopulation is a common phenomenon in many countries nowadays, which makes these people do not have enough accommodation to locate in.
In conclusion, while parks and squares are vital to communities to some extent, I still believe that other fundamental fields are more crucial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-07 | anhthunee | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | anhthunee | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-21 | caigicungduoc | 78 | view |
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 73
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 84
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land Which solution is better 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... bikes being placed in parks and squares . Secondly, since these places could be d...
^^
Line 3, column 779, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ob opportunities for many local people. However, I would argue that despite unde...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81575535147 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4124146783 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283703581922 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972149073008 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069675804002 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169716913151 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650996992608 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.