Topic: Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people hold the opinion that academic subjects should take precedence over cooking, dressing, or other practical life skills. I somewhat agree with this point of view because academic degrees are of importance when regarding future careers, but soft skills are also vital and need to be educated.
Advocates of this perspective point out a host of reasons. First and foremost, if students solely focus on core subjects at school, they may pass exams with flying colors, which would give them a competitive edge after graduate and looking for a good job. To illustrate, many big entrepreneurs in Vietnam, put great emphasis on certificates and often prioritize applicants who have high academic results. Another compelling reason is that studying formal lessons at schools requires plenty of time to help students have a clear understanding of what they have learned and how to use that knowledge in an actual work setting. Key subjects, thereby, should be concentrated on more than any other skills.
However, I would argue that we should encourage educational institutions to teach life skills such as cooking or dressing too. The main supporting reason is that the underestimating practical activities in school is to blame for lacking basic skills in students, which can lead to many consequences in their later life. It is exemplified by many cases, in which individuals find it hard to live without parents when they have started getting into university owing to poor cooking skills. Furthermore, in the increasingly competitive job market, employers not only looking for candidates with good school records but also appropriate those being proficient at life skills.
In conclusion, in spite of the tremendous merits of academic education, we should also take real experience into account to become more comprehensive and independent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-23 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Trangdodo | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-03 | supermanminh512 | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Nguyen Hung | 56 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- The maps below show changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2005 and present day 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian countries 80
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions 84
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33904109589 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91937341452 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66095890411 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1112031458 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.916666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214786973505 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693841134792 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439444625886 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117766257554 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028377100197 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.