The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first pie chart illustrates the percentage of energy consumption by different domestic usage and the second one demonstrates the gas emission released correspondingly by Australians.
Generally, Australians spend most of energy for heating, but surprisingly, it is water heating rather than heating that caused the most of greenhouse gas. Cooling only represents a small share in both segments.
Detailing power depletion of an average household in Australia is as followed. Water heating and heating consumed about two-thirds of the total percentage of power use, while other usages including refrigeration (7%), cooling (2%), lighting (4%), and other appliances (15%) only take up nearly one-third of that.
Detail of green house gas production, although requiring a massive amount of energy, heating only causes 15% of gas emissions. Opposing to that, the proportion of exhaust fumes from lighting and refrigeration double the percentage of energy usage, with 8% and 14% respectively. Other appliances produce quite a significant exhaustion, with nearly doubled the proportion of the energy consumed.
- environment problems facing today's world little ordinary people improve situation government and large companies should responsible for reducing the amount damage 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 61
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 87
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68484848485 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13688913765 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660606060606 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7287093885 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169660050591 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702169888439 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522497948328 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103757846211 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455732030575 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.