Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development?
It is clear that advertisements are almost integrated into people’s everyday lives thanks to technological advancement. Although it seems to be some disadvantages that advertisements provide, I contend that this is a positive development.
There are some drawbacks of adverts if they are not used for a good cause. Firstly, organizations now tend to use advertisements to promote unhealthy products that primarily target younger people. For example, many commercials of processed products promoted by fast-food companies that appear perpetually on television or social media might prompt children to pester parents to buy to please their desires since glamour adverts easily influence children. As a result, such unhealthy products will affect the well-being of children and make them more prone to obesity. Advertising also promotes unnecessary spending and create artificial wants; this might lead people to excessive consumerism that might damage their financial health.
Despite the aforementioned above, there are various conveniences that commercials can offer. Firstly, People are more likely to be informed of the up-to-date information of the new-release products through myriads means of media. People can save a great deal of time if they are too busy to shop around; they can rely on advertising to learn about new products. In addition, people can learn ways to protect the environment through advertisements. For example, Samsung corporation has recently promoted a recycling campaign through large-scale commercials to educate buyers on how to recycle cardboard boxes to save the environment. Furthermore, talented young people can now earn money by designing commercial content through either video-sharing or social media apps, namely Facebook and Youtube. Therefore, it helps to reduce the number of jobless rates amongst juveniles.
In conclusion, while the development of advertisements seems to show some negative prospects, this is indeed a positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-24 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | MEBC Class | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
- Research shows that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people engage in unhealthy activities What is the cause of this What can be done 89
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 78
- Some people today have argued that countries should interfere less in the affairs of other nations To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 84
- In today s competitive world many families find it necessary to have both parents go to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel that they lack support because of parent s absense Discuss both views 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...nts are almost integrated into people’s everyday lives thanks to technological advanceme...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'myriads'' or 'myriad's'?
Suggestion: myriads'; myriad's
...ion of the new-release products through myriads means of media. People can save a great...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78231292517 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20680300971 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9441206491 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136965926066 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437010989072 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543551293496 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106913705239 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613280975613 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.